Calling a bill that would have reduced permitted ammunition magazine sized from 15 rounds to 10 “reform in name only,” Governor Chris Christie conditionally vetoed A2006 this afternoon.
In his conditional veto message, Christie said the bill follows the well worn path of empty rhetoric, political self-promotion and polarizing intolerance in the face of violent crimes committed with guns:
“Difficult choices are brushed aside
in favor of empty rhetoric. Uncomfortable topics are left
unexplored, while easy soundbites and videoclips are packaged
for consumption. Appropriate empathy for victims, and their
suffering survivors, blurs with politics and elected officials’
self-promotion to create a polarizing intolerance. We ignore
the hard for the expedient, the controversial for the safely
familiar, and the costly for those cheaply recycled answers that
never really address the root causes.”
Christie sent the legislation back to the General Assembly as a bill that he says addresses violence by fixing critical short comings and crack in the mental healthcare system.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted: July 2nd, 2014 | Author: Art Gallagher | Filed under: Chris Christie, Crime, Crime and Punishment, Gun Control, Gun Rights, Guns | Tags: A2006, Chris Christie, Conditional Veto, Gun Control, Guns, Mental Health | 8 Comments »
Christie conditionally vetoes Sandy ‘Bill of Rights’
TRENTON — Gov. Chris Christie today stripped down a bill drafted in response to concerns about how well the state has distributed federal Hurricane Sandy relief aid, saying it included mandates that would be impossible to implement and featured “partisan…
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted: May 13th, 2014 | Author: admin | Filed under: Chris Christie, Christie Administration, Hurricane Sandy, Stephen Sweeney, Superstorm Sandy | Tags: Chris Christie, Conditional Veto, Sandy Bill of Rights, Seante President Steve Sweeney | Comments Off on Christie conditionally vetoes Sandy ‘Bill of Rights’
Reiterates his call for the issue to be decided by the people via referendum
Calls for the establishment of an Ombudsman to enforce the Civil Union Law
Governor Chris Christie sent S-1, the Marriage Equality and Religious Exemptions Act, back to the legislature this afternoon with his conditional veto.
Christie issued the following statement regarding his action:
“Today, I am adhering to what I’ve said since this bill was first introduced – an issue of this magnitude and importance, which requires a constitutional amendment, should be left to the people of New Jersey to decide. I continue to encourage the Legislature to trust the people of New Jersey and seek their input by allowing our citizens to vote on a question that represents a profoundly significant societal change. This is the only path to amend our State Constitution and the best way to resolve the issue of same-sex marriage in our state.
“I have been just as adamant that same-sex couples in a civil union deserve the very same rights and benefits enjoyed by married couples – as well as the strict enforcement of those rights and benefits. Discrimination should not be tolerated and any complaint alleging a violation of a citizen’s right should be investigated and, if appropriate, remedied. To that end, I include in my conditional veto the creation of a strong Ombudsman for Civil Unions to carry on New Jersey’s strong tradition of tolerance and fairness. The Ombudsman will be charged with increasing awareness of the law regarding civil unions, will provide a clear point of contact for those who have questions or concerns and will be required to report any evidence of the law being violated. In this way, we can ensure equal treatment under the law.”
A copy of the Conditional Veto can be found here.
Posted: February 17th, 2012 | Author: Art Gallagher | Filed under: Chris Christie, Marriage Equality, Marriage Equality and Religious Exemptions Act | Tags: Chris Christie, civil unions, Conditional Veto, Constitutional Amendment, Gay Marriage, Marriage Equality, Marriage Equality and Religious Exemptions Act, Ombudsman, Referendum, S-1, Same Sex Marriage | 4 Comments »